Stop the Surveillance Bills!
Copyright is Dead
The original contents of this post have been removed, as they may not have contained all pertinent information. That information was not necessarily available to me, or to the public.
It has come to my attention that noncommercial copying of digital music recordings may not be an infringement under Title 17 of the U.S. Code, "Copyrights." I apologize for any confusion I may have caused or any mistaken impression I may have given.
Please see the retraction I have published on my blog, at http://the_scrivener.blogspot.com/2007/06/retraction.html.
It has come to my attention that noncommercial copying of digital music recordings may not be an infringement under Title 17 of the U.S. Code, "Copyrights." I apologize for any confusion I may have caused or any mistaken impression I may have given.
Please see the retraction I have published on my blog, at http://the_scrivener.blogspot.com/2007/06/retraction.html.
posted by Mitchell L. Silverman | 11:56 AM
70 Comments:
Hi Mitchell,
You might want to check out section 1008 of the Audio Home Recording Act :
No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings.
The senate report on the act specifically cites making copies for family members as non-commercial uses, and thus not an infringement.
I should add that I'm NO Bush fan, but a stickler on copyright law. Here's a link to that Senate report, should you care:
http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/lipa/copyrights/The%20House%20Report%20on%20the%20Audio%20Home%20Recording%20Act%20of%201992.pdf
What's worse than copyright violation is that the sentence "Bush's twin daughters gave him a CD they had made" could mean they wrote songs and recorded them... now *that* is scary!
Even if the "mix cd" is infringing, the possible $1,800,000 fine is like pocket change for the bush family.
How do they know it was not public domain material? Just because they made a cd does not mean it had infringing content.
Whether you're a Bush fan or not, this is THE most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. I'm willing to bet that every single one of you have made or received a mix tape or CD at some point in your life -- do you feel like you owe someone $1.8 mil?
Turn yourselves in now. Or keep unjustifiably picking on a president you don't like in ways that have nothing to do with his administration.
While I agree that if the music is under commercial copyright it may be appropriate to pursue legal action, I think it’s outrageously arrogant to assume that the music was commercial to begin with. All music I listen to is freely redistributable. It’s not impossible or even unrealistic to avoid commercial music altogether.
It's actually not picking on the president, it's about the hypocrisy of the RIAA.
Anonymous (er, of the final comment), you're hideously under informed: this isn't about Bush, it's about the RIAA and restrictive copyright.
The humour, which apparently you missed, is that the RIAA's charge towards more punishing copyright has made a lot of headway because of corporate-interest-friendly Republicans, (but not by any means singularly so, the Dems have plenty of blame to take,) of which, incase you're reeeally under-informed, Bush is (more or less) one.
This also misses the fact that sites like iTunes which are heavily approved of by the RIAA not only give you the ability to purchase music, but to create mix CDs. A recent upgrade allows access to DRM free music for $0.30 more a song.
Hopefully, Mitch's clients don't pay for legal stupidity like this.
It was an iTunes CD DUMBASS!
mitchell@silverman-esquire.com
Here is the email address of the Jew-fuck Silverman
What a pompous ass! He is assuming the music is covered under the authority or interest of the RIAA. What if it was all African tribal music published in Africa?
i think what gets me the most is these millionaire daughters giving their dad a mix cd. even i can do better than that!
Why does the fact that this guy is Jewish matter? Don't be an ignorant fool.
You're an idiot.
The corporations that own the RIAA corporation can and do selectively enforce their copyrights. It's not like trademark infringement where if you don't enforce it you lose it. You can selectively enforce copyright infringement apparently.
HI THERE, MITCHELL,
YOU ARE THE MOST DIRTY, GREEDY AND SELFISH LAWYER/IDIOT/PERSON I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE. THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO DAMAGES DONE. ESPECIALLY SINCE THE SONGS WERE PREVIOUSLY BOUGHT, AND THE COPIES OF THE SONGS THAT THEY OWNED WERE ON THE CD, SO YOU LOSE. ALSO...
THERE'S AN ACT THAT IS IN PLACE THAT ABSOLUTELY STOPS YOU FROM DOIND THIS SO... YOU FAIL AT LIFE, AGAIN.
"The senate report on the act specifically cites making copies for family members as non-commercial uses, and thus not an infringement."
THANK YOU ANONYMOUS!!!
OK SO ANYWAY, YOU FAIL AT LIFE, GIVE IT UP, YOU JUST WANT BUSH'S MONEY, NOW LEAVE, AND GO SUE YOUR MOM FOR MAKING THAT MIX TAPE LAST WEEK, OK?
WITH LOVE, ANONYMOUS
we'll be paying it anyway.... heh
Well I liked the post. Damm some of these comments are so rude.
And I empathize with the humor.
And yes, there is no proof of definitive copyright violation, and the fine is insane. But that is also part of the point? After all many of these lawsuits (Or THREATS of lawsuits) and damages have been just a ludicrouse.
(I saw an article where parts of the recording industry were claiming lost revenues due to on-line piracy of music in France...in excess of the GNP of France!?)
*shrug* So if a single mother of 3 can get a letter demanding thousands of dollars in fines (or face trial) - because her 8 year old /might/ have downloaded a song (well someone did as they own a PC). Why can't the first twins at least be /asked/ if there mix CD is legal?
Hey... Not a Bush fan, but WTF WTF WTF WTF WTF.
YOU'VE GOTTA BE KIDDING ME.
1) "Downloading music is like taking it from the store" NO. DOWNLOADING MUSIC IS LIKE MAKING TWO COPIES OF A PICTURE YOU TOOK AND THEN GIVING IT TO YOUR FRIENDS. If copying is stealing from the store, then HEY! UHOH, GO TO JAIL, YOU JUST COPY AND PASTED THAT QUOTE!
2) I doubt any of those songs are worth THAT MUCH money. C'mon... That is WAY over what they should be charged.
3) RIAA SUCKS; SCREW THEM; THEY CAN GO TO HELL. Why? Let's make little kids not have a future because they downloading a song! WHO HASN'T illegally downloaded a song ANYWAYS, let ALONE COPY IT FROM A CD.
OOPS, SUE MY IPOD IT DOWNLOADED A SONG FROM MY CD.
OOPS SUE MY STEREO, IT CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL THAT WAS COPIED
wow, some of these responses are really fucking stupid. It's obvious most of you have no idea about copyright law in America.
To those complaining about the Lawyer doing this... Don't you understand this is just a marketing/PR stunt by him/his firm to get his name out there and earn some more clients?
As the moron above wrote, YOU ALL FAIL AT LIFE. Go back to watching the Azureus status bars...
It's sad that you people need it spelled out for you that the blogger is on our side, not the RIAA's. "Bush's side" is irrelevant in the context of this article, since the whole thing is hypothetical since the RIAA will never sue them. But forcing them to comment on it can embarass them and force them to evaluate their own practices.
If the crime is so bad that the RIAA will sue starving students and force them to settle for thousands of dollars, why won't they hold the adult-children of the President equally responsible, especially considering their responsibility to set an example to the public?
"It's sad that you people need it spelled out for you that the blogger is on our side, not the RIAA's. "Bush's side" is irrelevant in the context of this article, since the whole thing is hypothetical since the RIAA will never sue them. But forcing them to comment on it can embarass them and force them to evaluate their own practices.
If the crime is so bad that the RIAA will sue starving students and force them to settle for thousands of dollars, why won't they hold the adult-children of the President equally responsible, especially considering their responsibility to set an example to the public?"
Frggin' A... someone got it!
Nobody here seems to get it. They're sending the president's daughters a letter claiming damages of almost 2 million dollars.
For a present they gave him for Father's Day [lame or not, it's a gift, it's the spirit of the thing].
So, they're trying, and succeeding, to embarrass the president. They are embarrassing a man who can point at them and say to a guy in a black suit with black sunglasses, a white shirt and a black tie [not to mention the shoes]: "That man is an enemy combatant". Think about that, they are embarrassing a man who literally has the power to make them disappear without the right to habeas corpus, without legal recourse, without any means of defending themselves, for as long as the president wants. Merely at his behest.
This is the classic, textbook definition of fucking with the wrong marine.
Er, maybe you didn't get it. No one sent any letter asking for $1,800,000 in damages to Bush's daughters!
Try rereading the article before you post.
Fcuk the RIAA and all who associate with it.
seriously - aren't there enough people making political statements. I would think you as an attorney would have more important matters to worry about than trying to make the President look bad. He does ok on his own.
I think it is a wonderful letter and should be vigorously pursued. Quite frankly nothing will happen in copyright law until a senator or other person in office is sued for something their family did that everyone else is doing (i.e. making mix tapes) - trying to get more attention of the asinine copyright laws and EULA will take something like this happening. I wish the RIAA would sue them, even if they have a legal copy or used PD songs (like thats going to happen!) it will still highlight the issue.
I bet that whichever artists are on that CD, each one of them hates Bush and can't wait for him to get out of office like the rest of America.
My god! So many of you seemed to have completely missed the point of this article. This is not about George Bush being a good president. (How could it be, it's not even his actions they're talking about!).
This is not someone that honestly thinks the presidents daughters should be sued. (You may have heard of this kind of humor called sarcasm).
This is about how completely absurd the RIAA's continuous and plentiful lawsuits are. They sue people for this sort of thing all the time! But of course they would never sue the presidents daughters it would be absurd.
Although mind you that hasn't stopped them for suing people that don't even own computers for downloading music illegally (old women downloading gangsta rap huh?!?)
The difference is people sharing music over the Internet with millions of others and two daughters giving a legal copy of some music to their dad. This is the classic straw man argument. Create a false analogy and claim victory when you "Put it to em" The eight year old did not make a copy of a CD and give it to his mom, he downloaded a song and violated the song writers copyright, thus causing him to lose his car because he was depending on the royalty from that song to make the payment which was three months late because of so many people are downloading his songs through a peer-to-peer network and not buying his new CD which he maxed out his credit cards to make...
Leave poor Mitchell alone. He has already done FAR more harm to his reputation than any of your comments could ever do. He will suffer enough from this.
Wow, the sides have been represented. On the one side we've got Bush supporters who have lashed out at the post and even thrown out anti-Semitics slurs. On the other side we've got reasonable people who understand the humor and wit which criticizes the hipocrocy/ies of government and the RIAA. Smart people and a bunch of dumbasses....sounds like America.
Well, besides the fact that so many utterly and totally missed the point (the RIAA are a bunch of idiots) this has turned into another fun social experiment. Mention the word Bush and all reason flies out the window...
Ignorant idiots...
It's about the RIAA. It is not about it being wrong, but about the RIAA thinking it is wrong.
The article is about copyright law in America. So all of you dumbasses who defend downloading and accuse this lawyer, get the fucking stick out of your ass, and go look up humor and satire in wikipedia.
Kudos to the lawyer.
If this is getting you exercised you should know that Bush was photographed with an iPod about two years ago, the playlist was visible and had about 5 Beatles' songs in view. The problem? At the time the only way to get a Beatles' song on an iPod was to rip it "illegally." So really the RIAA should go after Bush 43 first.
Wow, only a select few get this article. Leave Bush out of it. He is not the enemy in this case. The majority of you just want to bash him as usual. Get over yourselves. You're not making a difference by posting your childish rants.
Again the confusion over copyright is so blatant. There is as much a difference between sharing a cd with one friend and with 1 million anonymous internet downloaders as there is drinking one beer and driving and drinking 24 beers and driving. It's obvious the "copyfighters" can't see the forest for the trees. This post is a parody of the EFF, showing how silly their arguments are.
Thank you, Mitchell, for writting about this. Please excuse the people misunderstanding your post. I hope they come back and actually read what you wrote.
Thanks!
see http://hotshadow.com/
Does any one recall that Bush that bush himself stated that he had the Beatles on his iPod long before it was available through iTunes? Wasn't that copyright infringement?
I love all the idiots that don't get that this is HUMOR, (Satire don't go on your truck and Irony aint what you hit your wife with)
"Maybes them was songs his pappy made and weren't under no law, You suck and make Jesus and Dale Earnhardt cry. You must be a terrorist or somethin! Dubya Rules!!"
Gotta love the Red States..
Are people retarded? Why do they think that this man is going to sue the Bush family for downloading music... this post was supposed to show irony and be funny. I swear some people...
Slashdotted!
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/07/06/22/1653212.shtml
If they did download the songs illegally, they should actually go through with this suit.
The whole point would not be taking $ from the Bush family, but to make our president actually give a shit that our copyright laws are incredibly unfair.
1.8million dollars???? COME ON!
@ EVERY-FUCKING-BODY
Most people seem to not know anything about this.
First off, Bush ripping a Beatles' CD to his iPod is not illegal, since he had already (presumably) purchased the music on a CD.
Second, assuming his daughters had already purchased the tracks that they burned onto the CD, they were allowed to create the CD. HOWEVER, they were not allowed to distribute the "mix CD", for profit or not.
oh, and also, this article was not made for the purpose of ripping off Bush, it was to show the hipocricy of the RIAA standards, where they can charge the mother of an 8 year old boy, since he /may/ have downloaded a song to the computer.
Well said.
I found out about this from Slashdot.
I'm sorry to say this, but I spent 2 years in federal prison because I infringed upon copyrights just like they did and it was absolute a stated fact in the court case that it was 100% for personal non-commercial use. No profit was ever made, but I still did time. It's just as illegal and I did the time to prove it.
The sisters may not be in violation of the Audio Home Recording Act, but if they user any tools designed to circumvent copy protection or digital rights management technology, they are in violation of the DMCA.
man, its awful that only a select few actually 'got' this post. are the rest of you morons?
its pointing out the stupidity and hypocricy of riaa, who keep crying that they're loosing money out of every song that is distributed (and not purchased), going after people for compensation (college students for example), and at the same time ignoring a publicised news about a mixed cd that could have potentially been made from songs that were not purchased for the purpose of authoring this cd. they seem to conveniently ignore that they could be loosing profits from the few songs that were on the mixed cd.
you have way too much time on your hands. do something productive like pound sand and eat gastropod mollusks.
Dumb fuck.
I'm not even going to address those of you who thought that
a) the whole thing was an excuse to bash the President (as if anyone needed MORE material)- let me just say that while satire may not be dead, a lot of your brains appear to be; or
b) that the RIAA is actually suing the Bush twins (because you obviously can't read anyway, so there's no reason to believe you'll comprehend my post.
I will address those of you who brought up the Senate report on whether distributing copies is a violation, though.
1) A Congressional report is not law. A court may observe its findings when deliberating, but is not bound to do so.
Also, regardless of whether copying protected material for personal use is legal or not, the RIAA claims it is illegal .
"At the Thomas trial in Minnesota, Sony BMG's chief of litigation, Jennifer Pariser, testified that "when an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." Copying a song you bought is "a nice way of saying 'steals just one copy,' " she said."
(from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/28/AR2007122800693.html )
The whole thing is just a big send-up of the RIAA's position. The fact that the Bush twins haven't actually violated the law is immaterial.
Take down the apology, Michael.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Keep the Thumbs Up!
Legal Advice
michael kors handbags, kate spade, nike air max, michael kors outlet online, nike air max, replica watches, cheap oakley sunglasses, uggs on sale, louis vuitton outlet online, ralph lauren outlet, ralph lauren polo, ray ban sunglasses, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet, burberry factory outlet, burberry outlet, oakley sunglasses, louboutin uk, nike outlet, uggs on sale, oakley sunglasses, tiffany jewelry, cheap jordans, tiffany jewelry, prada handbags, michael kors outlet store, louis vuitton, longchamp bags, louis vuitton outlet, gucci handbags, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton handbags, christian louboutin, louboutin shoes, tory burch outlet, christian louboutin, prada outlet, oakley sunglasses, michael kors, uggs on sale, longchamp outlet, uggs outlet, ray ban sunglasses, uggs outlet, replica watches, nike free
coach outlet, new balance, louboutin pas cher, polo lacoste pas cher, nike roshe run pas cher, lululemon outlet, true religion jeans, coach purses, coach outlet, sac guess pas cher, vanessa bruno pas cher, polo ralph lauren uk, kate spade outlet, nike free, burberry pas cher, longchamp pas cher, nike air max, true religion outlet, nike tn pas cher, hollister uk, michael kors, michael kors, north face pas cher, true religion outlet, timberland pas cher, coach outlet store online, nike air max uk, north face uk, nike free pas cher, abercrombie and fitch, hermes pas cher, vans pas cher, converse, mulberry uk, abercrombie and fitch UK, jordan pas cher, nike air max pas cher, michael kors outlet online, nike roshe uk, michael kors uk, ray ban uk, true religion outlet, lunette oakley pas cher, lunette ray ban pas cher, nike air max uk
zhengjx20160509
ray ban eyeglasses
toms wedges
michael kors outlet
rolex watches
ray ban outlet
concord 11
kate spade outlet
air jordan shoes
oakley vault
toms outlet
michael kors outlet
cheap louis vuitton handbags
coach outlet store online clearances
gucci outlet
louis vuitton outlet
timberlands
nfl jerseys
mont blanc pen
jordan 3 retro
coach factory outlet online
nike air max 90
louis vuitton purses
christian louboutin sale
rolex watches
cheap oakleys
oakley outlet
coach factory outlet online
michael kors
fit flops
replica rolex watches
coach outlet store online
michael kors outlet clearance
michael kors outlet
kate spade
nike air max uk
retro 11
cheap oakley sunglasses
louis vuitton purses
coach outlet store online clearances
vans sneakers
__
شركة تنظيف فى تبوك المروة
تعد النظافة أمر مهم في كل بيت ولهذا من مهمتنا نحن أفضل شركة تنظيف بتبوك الشركة الأقوى والأعرق بين شركات التنظيف أن نوفر لكل ربة بيت تعاني من تنظيف البيت الشاق كل ما يجعل بيتها يلمع كالبريق، فلا داعي للقلق عزيزي العميل من الآن، فمعنا ستجد ما لم تجده في أي شركة تنظيف علي الإطلاق حيث نوفر لك ما يلي:
خدمة شاملة لتنظيف المكان علي أيدي عمالة مدربة ومؤهلة للعمل منذ عشرات السنين في مجال تنظيف شقق ومنازل بتبوك، وجميع خدمات النظافة الأخري.
يمكن لشركتنا شركة تنظيف فى تبوكأن تقدم أفضل جودة من العمل في مجال التنظيف بأرخص الأسعار الموجودى في السوق.
تعتمد شركة المروة شركة تنظيف عمائر في تبوك علي استخدام مواد التنظيف الفعالة والمؤثرة لإزالة الأوساخ والبقع بسهولة، والآمنة تماماً علي صحة كل من بالمنزل صغاراً، وكباراً.
تتميز شركة تنظيف بتبوك في عملها بالتنظيم والترتيب الذي يجعل في النهاية المكان كأنه جديد بالمثل، فيمكن أولاً أن تقوم بإزالة الأتربة والغبار الموجود علي الفرش، ثم تقوم بغسيل الكنب والبقع الموجودة عليه باستخدام آلات البخار حيث أنها من أفضل شركات تنظيف بالبخار في تبوك، بعدها تدخل في مرحلة، التطهير والتعقيم، والتعطير، مما يجعل المكان رائع الجمال، ومريح للنفس، كل هذا بأرخص وأقل الأسعار التي لا يمكن أن تتخيلها.
لدي شركة المروة أحسن شركة تنظيف في تبوك خدمات أخري يمكنك الاستعانة بها في أي وقت وتتمثل في الآتي.
تنظيف شقق وعمائر بالمدينة المنورة
تنظيف فلل في بالمدينة المنورة.
تنظيف كنب في بالمدينة المنورة
تنظيف ستائر في بالمدينة المنورة.
تنظيف سجاد وموكيت بالمدينة المنورة.
وغيرها من خدمات التنظيف الأخري، سعدنا ويشرفنا في أي وقت اتصالكم ، وستجد كل ما يرضيك، ويذهلك.
تحرص شركة المروة لتقديم أقوي عروض وخدمات نقل العفش لجميع القائمين في تبوك، وتقوم بتقديم خدمات منوعة من خدمات فك وتركيب العفش بجميع أنواع بحيث يشمل نقل غرف الأطفال، والمطابخ، والأجهزة الكهربائية، كما تمتلك الشركة أفضل المعدات والأدوات الازمة لنقل العفش عن طريق الأوناش الهيدروليكية، وتسعي الشركة بشكل كبير عند نقل العفش علي الحفاظ علي كل قطعة فيه.فهو أمر ليس بالسهل علينا أن نقوم بها
لذلك ننصحك بالاتصال بأفضل شركة نقل عفش في تبوك لما بها من مميزات أخرى تتمثل فيما يلي:
• شركة نقل عفش فى تبوك شركة متخصصة تعمل على إنهاء المهام بشكل كلي وعلى أكمل وجه.
• تحرص الشركة على استلام العفش من المكان المحدد وتسلمه للعميل مفروشا بشكل رائع في المكان الجديد.
• تقوم بتغليف الفرش بأفضل شكل علي الإطلاق.
• تستخدم شركة نقل عفش فى تبوك الكراتين، والبلاستيك والاسفنج والأوراق أيضا لتغليفها بشكل جيد.
• تعتبر شركة نقل عفش فى تبوك ارخص شركة بين منافسيها مع جودة في العمل والأداء.
• خدمة متوفرة على مدار 24 ساعة.
• متاح في الشركة الرد على أي عميل في أي وقت كان.
• تعتمد الشركة علي كبار المتخصصين من فني تركيب وتغليف وتعبئة العفش.
• تقوم باستخدام النايلون الحراري والحافظات الكرتونية.
• تعتمد في نقل البضائع وفرش العرايس وغيرها علي أفضل السيارات المقفلة والمجهزة.
• تحرص الشركة علي تأمين المستودع من الحرائق المفاجئة أو السيول.
• تعمل علي تأمين المستودع من الحشرات والقوارض التي تضر العفش.
• يمكنها نقل البضائع اياً كان نوعها من أي مكان إلي مكان آخر
• لديها خبراء وماهرين في نقل الاثاث في اسرع وقت.
لهذه الأسباب السابقة من الأفضل لك أن تستعين بشركتنا شركة نقل عفش في تبوك وستجدنا أينما كنت.
https://hacknovations.org/digitalocean-review/
تقدم شركة التقوي خدمة مكافحة حشرات بكافة أنواعها الطائرة والزاحفة، وكذلك مكافحة القوارض، للمنازل والشركات والمصانعو لا ننسي خدمة مكافحة الثعابين والزواحف ضمن خدماتن
ا
خدمتنا مميزة في هذا المجال وبرنامجنا في المكافحة مطور بإستخدام أجود أنواع المبيدات الحشرية الآمنة وننفذه بطريقة علمية علي
أيدي خبراء مدربين علي أعلي مستوي وبعد المكافحة نقدم برنامج الوقاية اللازم لضمان جودة الخدمة المقدمة ولضمان عدم وجود أي
حشرات مخبأة أو في أماكن التوالد غير المرئية
مع خدماتنا المتميزة لن تقلق علي مصنعك وأجهزتك ومعداتك ولن يخاف أبناؤك من الحشرات أو القوارض بعد اليوم
. اتصل بنا وتعرف علي عروضنا المتميزة المقدمة من شركة التقوي للخدمات المتكاملة
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة تسليك مجاري بالرياض
شركة جلي بلاط بالرياض
شركة التقوي للخدمات المنزلية بالرياض
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض
شركة بيع وشراء اثاث بالرياض
شركة صيانة مكيفات بالرياض
شركة صيانة مسابح بالرياض
شركة تنظيف بالرياض
شركة صيانة مسابح بالرياض
شركة تعقيم بالرياض
شركة مكافحة الصراصير بالرياض
شركة رش الدفان بالرياض
شركة تنظيف موكيت بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مساجد بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مسابح بالرياض
شركة تسليك مجاري بالرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مكيفات بالرياض
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالرياض
شركة نقل اثاث بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركة تنظيف مجالس بالرياض
شركة تنظيف شقق بالرياض
شركة رش مبيدات بالرياض
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالمزاحمية
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالخرج
شركة تنظيف بالخرج
فرسان العرب
ارخص شركة تنظيف مجالس في الرياض
افضل شركة تنظيف مجالس في الرياض
شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
يعمل طاقم عمل شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة على تفريغ وملئ صناديق العفش بأيدي متخصصين وكل ما عليك فقط هو تقديم التعليمات لنا وتوجيهنا للأماكن التي ترغب بترتيب كل قطعة من العفش بها وسيقوم عمالنا بتفريغ كل ما تحتاج وتركيب قطع العفش لذا يمكنك الاستفادة من وقتك بإنجاز مهام أخرى مثل إجراءات انتقالك كل هذا متوفر وبأرخص الأسعار المتوفرة.
_____________________________
شركة تنظيف بالمدينة المنورة
يهتم طاقم عمل شركة تنظيف بالمدينة المنورة بتنظيف الأثاث إما منفصلة أو ضمن خدمة تنظيف القصر أو المنازل والشقق والفلل حيث يقوم فريق شركة تنظيف بالمدينة المنورة بغسيل قماش الأثاث والمفروشات وتنظيفه من خلال مواد قوية وفعالة في التنظيف وتلميع الرخام والأخشاب والأسطح الزجاجية وجلي الأرضيات بجميع أنواعها حيث يستخدم فريق التنظيف أحدث أدوات ومواد للتنظيف الفعال.
______________________
شركة تنظيف كنب بالمدينة المنورة
تستعين شركة تنظيف كنب بالمدينة المنورة بفريق عمل كبير ذو خبرة كبيرة حيث تنظيفها يتم سريعاً وبجودة مضمونة كما يجب تنظيف الأرض بمختلف أنواعها ليبدو الكنب أنظف وأنقى موضوعاً على أرض نظيفة ونقوم بتنظيف الأثاث مثل الكراسي والطاولات و المكاتب ونقوم بالقضاء على البقع من على الكنب مثل بقع الحبر وذلك بوضع قطرات من الكحول وترش بالبخاخة مكان البقعة .
_________________
Post a Comment
<< Home